Answer: West Berlin enjoyed freedom in cross sectional sectors of living. The society welcomed various and diverse new ideas, as citizens were allowed to explore as many sectors as they can. They enjoyed more luxury than those in East Berlin.
Explanation:
During the time that Berlin was divided, it was a really divided way of living among between the two towns which were faced off againts each other. Those who resided in East Berlin didn't enjoy much freedom due to they were under a system controlled by communist. The city experienced losses in economy and the Russians. Based on how rigid the system was, citizens could only afford few luxury.
On the other hand West Berlin enjoyed freedom in cross sectional sectors of living. The society welcomed various and diverse new ideas, as citizens were allowed to explore as many sectors as they can. They enjoyed more luxury than those in East Berlin.
The atmosphere is important because it contains ozone layers that absorb ultraviolet radiation UV coming from the sun, by thus it is protecting human beings and most living species from negative ultraviolet radiation and thanks to that many species live on Earth. Besides, that atmosphere keeps Earth warm thanks to greenhouse it produces and lowers the temperature leaps between day and night.
The answer is A. Medicaid. Medicaid in the United States is a social health care program for families and individuals with low income and limited resources. You can also check an online encyclopedia.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
B. recognizing that there is a problem or opportunity.
