Answer:
I think the right method to protect the environment and protect energy is to use renewable resources. If we used renewable resources within time all the nonrenewable resources we used would be replenished. I also think this would be the right thing to do because, for example if we used solar or wind energy we wouldn't waste energy as much as we do now days.
However if we were to use this. The cost for using renewable energy would be money. These days solar energy is very expensive, if we were to start using it we would spend a lot of money. Another thing is we would have to make sure that we are storing some energy in case the weather conditions are bad. (solar energy)
All in all, I think using renewable energy is the way to go, if we used this we could protect the environment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Even though globes are showing Earth more accurately, the maps are still used because they are more practical.
Explanation:
Earth is generally shown with two methods, one being the maps (map projections) and the other being globes. Both are used and will be used, as both have several advantages, but also several disadvantages. Despite globes being closer and more accurate in their representation of Earth, the maps are still used because they are much more practical.
The globes show Earth very close to its true form, though they are made as a ball, not as an ellipsoid. Anyhow, the globes don't have distortions of areas, so the sizes and locations are accurate on them. On the other hand, globes are highly impractical because of their shape, as they are don't often fit in standard backpacks or bags, and can easily be broken or damaged. Also, we can not see the entire Earth at any moment, so it is hard to make comparisons by using them.
The maps, on the other side, do have inaccuracies, mostly by having distortions, be it around the Equator or around the poles. Despite this, they have a relatively good accuracy that in most cases is enough for practical usage. Also, their form and weight make them easy to use, move from place to place, and the entire world can be seen at the same time, thus they are very practical when it comes to making comparisons.
B is the answer because......
Answer:
It is partially true, "life finds a way" but human activities have already made some irreversible damage to the world.
Explanation:
In a Hypotethic scenario in which Humans are extinct nature Will eventually, start succession processes in urban areas and after many years depending on the erosional resistance of the materials nature will erase many of the buildings around the world ( 500 years for metal). Water bodies will eventually decontaminate trough the water cycle and be filled with organisms, contamination due to petrol can also be reverted through natural chemical processes with oxygen.
But human activities like mining are irreversible, for the earth, it is impossible to recover its shape, the materials already extracted and soil nutrients that ran out due to the use of chemicals.
The acceleration of the climate change due to human activities is for sure the biggest wound we have made to the world, this is an irreversible acceleration to a natural process.
The age of the Earth is around 4.6 billion years old
