The correct answer is C) the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
Until 1987, in cases of extradition, the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
For extradition, we understand the faculty that the government of the United States has to surrender a fugitive to other country or state because it has to face criminal charges.
With the Supreme Case of "Kentucky vs. Dennison" in 1860, the federal court did not have the authority to demand the return of a fugitive to another state. This changed in 1987 with the resolution of the case "Puerto Rico v. Brandstand," that overruled the "Kentucky vs. Dennison" case.
Solon eliminated debt slavery
Reject the division by which men belong to the public and women to the private sphere.
Calling for women to be granted the right to vote
Greater rights in education and employment
Explanation:
- Since the founding of the United States, women have been excluded from voting rights. The promises of equality enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution have not long been fulfilled.
- The movement for women's suffrage emerged in the early 19th century, alongside the movement to abolish slavery. One of the women who showed a keen interest in participating in the fight to end slavery was Lucretia Mot, who often spoke publicly on the subject.
- Soon, Elizabeth Cady Stenton joined the abolitionist forces. She and Lucretia Mot agree that women's rights should be equated with men's rights, and in July 1848 they organized a convention in Seneca Falls, New York, when full civil rights for women were first demanded.
- The delegates present then stress that women and men should be equal in all rights, and reject the division by which men belong to the public and women to the private sphere. The product of this convention is a declaration calling for women to be granted the right to vote and to be given greater rights in education and employment.
Learn more on Seneca Falls Convention on
brainly.com/question/1455384
brainly.com/question/6247275
brainly.com/question/8957055
#learnwithBrainly
The correct answer is C) They saw their lack of any losses as proof that they were destined to control the land.
The warfare between colonists and American Indians during the 17th century generated a sense of superiority among the colonists in that "they saw their lack of any losses as proof that they were destined to control the land."
Without a doubt, the white European colonies had much better weapons than the Native American Indian tribes. The Indians had disadvantages on this issue that affected the results in battles.
This created the wrong impression in the colonists that they were better prepared and deserved the right to control the land and domain the Native American Indians.
This, of course, generated a lot of resentment on the part of the Indians that saw how the white colonizers continued to take their lands to settle in and exploit the raw materials and natural resources.
Answer:
research design
Explanation: Hope this Helps!
