Hello. I don't know what evidence you mentioned in your previous assignment, which makes it impossible for me to answer your question efficiently. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way, showing you how to justify the chosen doubts.
you must justify the evidence based on the importance it has in the story you read. If you selected evidence where Douglass reflects on the importance of education, you can justify it by using the fact that education is liberating and would allow slaves to have enough knowledge to fight for themselves. If you used evidence about the misrepresentation that slavery imposes on society, you can justify how slavery is based on dominance and humiliation, generating results as depressing as the process itself.
Answer:
Refer below.
Explanation:
The creator does exclude an area investigating counterarguments or an end.
In spite of the fact that there are numerous outstanding instances of fruitful journalists who were known—in any event to a limited extent—for their lethargy, instances of individuals who were effective as an immediate consequence of their tirelessness possess large amounts of a wide scope of controls. Michael Jordan, for instance, is broadly viewed as one of the best ball players ever. During his profession, he was known for his tenacious seriousness and scrupulousness. Among writers, Ray Bradbury was known for keeping in touch with one short story consistently—a shocking pace of creation. What's more, numerous other fruitful creators have set page amounts and severe timetables for themselves. Along these lines, while downgrading profitability may have worked for a few, concentrating eagerly on it has worked for some others.
I discover my counterargument genuinely compelling. The creator's contention fundamentally comprises of narrative proof. It would be compelling if the entirety of the accessible proof bolstered the focal case. However, the measure of narrative proof that doesn't bolster the case debilitates the creator's contention and reinforces my counterarguement.