Answer:
$31,100
Explanation:
On May 31 of the current year, the assets and liabilities of Riser, Inc. are as follows: Cash $20,500; Accounts Receivable, $7,250; Supplies, $650; Equipment, $12,000; Accounts Payable, $9,300.
Therefore the amount of stockholders’ equity as of May 31 of the current year can be derived by the formula : Capital = Assets - Liabilities
<u>Assets</u>
Cash $20,500;
Accounts Receivable, $7,250;
Supplies, $650;
Equipment, $12,000
TOTAL = 40,400
<u>Liabilities</u>
Accounts Payable, $9,300.
Therefore stockholders’ equity = 40,400 - 9,300 = $31,100
The marketplace is full of both potential and non-potential customers which makes this statement <u>True</u>.
<h3>Are both potential and non-potential customers in the market?</h3>
The market does indeed have both potential customers for a product and non-potential customers who would not want to buy the product.
As a result, it is not possible to directly market to only potential customers, but to the entire marketplace.
Find out more on potential customers at brainly.com/question/3053467.
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. Holding cost per unit per year is dependent on the selling price per unit.
Explanation:
The formulas are shown below:
Economic order quantity:
= 
The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
The average inventory would equal to
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
Carrying cost = average inventory × carrying cost per unit
If in the question, the carrying cost is given in the percentage than the per unit cost is come after multiplying it with the selling price per unit
Answer:
The answer is Accumulated other comprehensive income
Explanation:
The statement of accumulated other comprehensive income is specific to U.S GAAP.It is known as statement of comprehensive under International Financial Reporting Standards.
The statement records losses and gains that are unrealized.For instance a company whose investment is in shares,would have to record the investment at fair value, that is the market price at each year end, any gains or losses arising from such valuation,especially if the shares are held for long term, is posted to the accumulated other comprehensive income or statement of comprehensive income.
The reason is that the shares are still held within the business not yet disposed of,hence the gains or losses are not realized and should not be recognized in profit or loss.
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
