In an) primary, people vote directly for a candidate.

1 answer:

5 0

I am confused as to what the question is. I hope this helps! In other U.S. elections, candidates are elected directly by popular vote. But the president and vice president are not elected directly by citizens. Instead, they're chosen by “electors” through a process called the Electoral College. The process of using electors comes from the Constitution.

You might be interested in

URGENT PLZ HELP

dsp73

Answer:

blood left at the scene includes the direct evidence.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following are not negotiable instruments?

Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

Che ques are not generally negotiable instruments in California. If you are talking about another state then the answer may vary.

Explanation:

8 0

4 years ago

What is the name of a bilateral agreement between a seller, (the vendor) and a buyer (the vendee) in which the vendor defers rec

Shalnov [3]

Answer:

The correct answer is Land contracts or Contracts for deed.

Explanation:

Land contracts or contracts for deed were a type of contract with easy accessibility and good financing conditions than those offered by institutional lenders between 1970 and 1980.

When these lenders began to lower the necessary requirements to grant loans and mortgage rates declined, these types of contracts were disappearing although they did not completely.

When people had difficulties with banks to ask for loans or mortgages, then they went to these contracts that were much more accessible.

The way it works is as follows:

An agreement is established between a Vendor and a Vendee, where the Vendor agrees to sell a property by financing the purchase for the Vendee.

The Vendor keeps the legal title and gives the Vendee the equitable title.

Financing is offered to Vendee.

Once the payment is completed, the seller will receive a deed of ownership.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT something you should always do before a

Kruka [31]

I think the answer is B

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The state of New York passes a law that prohibits transgender persons from going to the bathrooms of their choice. Max, an adult

Dafna1 [17]

Answer and Explanation:

1. The state of New York can claim that they are within the rights defended by the bathroom bill (since this law allows the restriction of transgender people to bathrooms that are not determined by their gender of birth) and that the decision was made to maintain the safety of cisgender people.

2. I would recommend that the family look for facts that prove that this measure does not promote the safety of anyone, as there have never been cases of attacks by transgender individuals on cisgender individuals in public bathrooms, on the contrary, this measure causes insecurity for transgender individuals. , since there are countless cases of attacks on these individuals due to prejudice, homophobia and intolerance. In addition, the family may claim that the bathroom bill also advocates allowing transgender individuals to access toilets that match their gender identity, as a measure of security and promoting equality.

5 0

3 years ago