The process of assimilation generally had a negative impact on Native American communities, and oftentimes assimilation was not successful and was strongly resisted by the tribes. It began to break down the cohesive culture of various Native American tribes, taking children away from their families and sending them to boarding schools. At these schools, sometimes assimilation was moderately successful, but at the cost of depriving these children of their heritage and created a disconnect between them and their families.
Another aspect of assimilation that had a negative impact was the US attempt to incorporate Native Americans and their land into the greater country by offering citizenship and land allotments, forcing a political and social model on them that was inconsistent with their long-established traditions and culture.
Farmers were essentially slaves, however, worked less hard. The agriculturist's activity was to plant and develop crops which were transformed into sustenance. Divine beings were dealt with well since they were the most elevated rank.The divine beings had services held by ministers. The Egyptians imagined that on the off chance that they treated divine beings well they would get a ton of rain and would enable the ranchers to develop crops. A few Egyptians were sold into bondage as a result of obligations or sold themselves to escape neediness.
<span>1) The national government could not force the states to obey its laws.2) It did not have the power to tax.3 It did not have the power to enforce laws.4) Congress lacked strong and steady leadership.<span>5) There was no national army or navy.</span></span>
Answer:
Feminism as a women's movement, and as one of the politics of identity is a struggle to disarm the social construction of gender. It is an emancipatory project aimed at eliminating gender inequalities.
Explanation:
The main point of the feminist economy in this regard is the sexual division of labor, which includes the distribution of productive and reproductive work in homes, the market and the State, on the one hand, and between men and women, on the other, it implies an economic subordination of women that is indicated in a lower participation in paid work (greater in the unpaid), a worse participation in the labor market (in terms of remuneration and working conditions), less access to resources economic and as a consequence, a lower degree of economic autonomy.
To measure the degree of social impact once the gender dynamics underlying the functioning of the economic system are visualized, the next step is to analyze the impact of economic policies on gender equity, through the intervention of the State and markets that distribute resources and economic opportunities. Because the apparent gender neutrality of the State's economic policies is in fact gender blindness, and unless it is exceeded little, one can move forward on the path of equity.