1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir [108]
3 years ago
7

How did dr. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X differ in their approaches to gaining civil rights

History
1 answer:
lyudmila [28]3 years ago
6 0
Though both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both worked on the goal of helping blacks in their struggle for civil rights in the United States in the 1960s, their approach and speech was very different.  Martin was more conciliatory in his approach.  He used peaceful methods and often incorporated the teachings of the Bible.  He wanted blacks and whites to coexist with each other.  Malcolm on the other hand, was very aggressive in his approach.  He was not afraid to lash out at what he viewed was the unfair treatment that blacks were given and encourage violent means to achieve that goal.     
You might be interested in
A wealthy person has a savings account with a bank. Every month the bank pays this person interest based on the amount of money
ElenaW [278]
"<span>The customer would reinvest his savings somewhere else, and the bank would have less money to lend" is the most likely outcome, but of course this depends on the person. </span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name the magazine that ranks music each week. A. Guitar Player B. Downbeat C. Billboard D. TV Guide
Alex787 [66]
Billboard is the answe
5 0
4 years ago
The kingdom of Mali was the first empire to control the trade of?
sergey [27]

Answer:

Salt.

Explanation:

Mali was famous for its salt mines. It was one of the richest countries due to their access to salt.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who did ronald reagan run against in the 1984 election?
Delicious77 [7]
Walter Mondale ran against Reagan.
6 0
3 years ago
How many people starved to death during the British Raj?A)10 million B)15 million C)20 million D)25 million
stepladder [879]

Answer:

D. 25 million (a very conservative estimation)

Explanation:

The British Raj was the territorial entity in actual India under the British rule which lasted from 1858 to 1947, in which happened 8 nationwide famines, which are described below:

1) Upper Doab Famine (1860 - 1861) - 2 million dead.

2) Orissa Famine (1865 - 1867) - 4 million dead.

3) Rajputana Famine (1869) - 1.5 million dead.

4) Bihar Famine (1873 - 1874) - No significant deaths due to relief efforts.

5) Southern Indian Famine (1876 - 1878) - 6 million dead.

6) Indian Famine (1896 - 1897) - 12 million dead.

7) Indian Famine (1899 - 1900) - 3 million dead.

8) Bengal Famine (1943) - 1.5 million dead.

Total death toll: 30 million

The option that is a better approximation is D.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The south looked at slavery as an economic issue. the north viewed slavery as what kind of issue?
    5·2 answers
  • Here you just have to match. See the picture. . .
    15·1 answer
  • How is great Zimbabwe evidence that there was world trade one thousand years ago? A. It traded with merchants from as far away a
    6·1 answer
  • Why did hammurabi make a set of laws
    7·2 answers
  • Who was involved in the suger act 1764
    8·1 answer
  • ¿Who were the aristocrats of Ancient Athends?
    14·1 answer
  • What is Eisenhower saying about what it mean to be an American citizen
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the impact of the columbian exchange in the Western Hemisphere ( New World ). Include both positive and negative outcom
    5·1 answer
  • analyze the causes and the path leading to the second world war. How did that war affect the Vietnamese revolution
    6·1 answer
  • What made it difficult for people to survive or escape concentration camps
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!