1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alika [10]
3 years ago
6

Which statement best describes a challenge in the Roman economy?

History
1 answer:
Marina CMI [18]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The tax burden on citizens in Rome was too high

Explanation:

If your options are the following:

Rome had difficulty finding trading partners

Rome lacked resources to build infrastructure

The tax burden on citizens in Rome was too high

Trade competition led to conflict between social classes

The answer is The tax burden on citizens in Rome was too high. Rome had plenty of trade partners, was renowned for its infrastructure, and while there certainly were some conflicts between social classes, taxes were a far greater contributing factor to the fall of the empire, and thus are a better option for the question.

You might be interested in
AP World History
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

The answer is “can no longer ignore Italy “

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What is one historical example for the separation of powers
e-lub [12.9K]
The british government when parliament was formed. they wanted a balance of monarchy and democracy so they added parliament to balance out with the king
5 0
3 years ago
a)Identify, based on your reading, ONE specific example about the relationship between government and public works during the 13
Makovka662 [10]

Answer: they worked hard to be able to get it done with. The creation of it caused some deaths but helped out in the end

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
According to the lesson, what two things put an effective end to the Jim Crow laws in this country?
guajiro [1.7K]

Civil Rights act of 1964 and The Voting Rights Ac t.

7 0
3 years ago
Should nationwide be bound to the settlement why or why not rule of laws
zhannawk [14.2K]
Personally, i believe that nationwide should not be bound to the settlement.
the main purpose of the settlement is to attract a lot of people from all over the world that came with various culture and ethnicity to populate and generte the economy within the certain area.
Of course, during the beginning of the settlement process, the Area will tend to be lawless and a lot of crimes might occur. It might get worse before it got better.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these provisions was included in the Treaty of Versailles (1919)? European disarmamentself-determination of all peopleT
    10·2 answers
  • William jennigins Bryan supported the cause of in the 1896 presidential election
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the growth of the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1936.
    8·2 answers
  • Look at the sequence of events below for Japan in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
    12·1 answer
  • explain why east pakistan wish to become independent of west pakistan? plz tell me accoding to 7 mark.
    9·1 answer
  • Which quote summarizes President Woodrow Wilson's approach to the Paris Peace Conference? (3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the trade between the North African Berbers and the Empires of<br> West Africa.
    14·1 answer
  • Why was slavery was such an important issue to the North?
    15·1 answer
  • How did railroads contribute to industrialization? How did they affect the US economy?
    7·1 answer
  • PLESSS I BEG OF U HELPP ME
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!