1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viktor [21]
2 years ago
11

Art can evoke different emotions and reactions in people. Which painting was attacked by someone who didn't like abstract art?

History
1 answer:
taurus [48]2 years ago
6 0
The painting of Barnett Newman's Cathedra evoked different emotions and reactions in people and was attacked by someone who didn't like abstract art. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option. The person who attacked the painting was Gerard Jan Van Bladeren. 
You might be interested in
The map shows the final battles of the American Revolution. What does the map suggest about French involvement at this stage of
harkovskaia [24]
The support of the French led directly to the surrender of British forces
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which action is considered a mandatory responsibility of US citizenship?
inessss [21]
The answer is serving on a jury
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Corn and potatoes, both American crops, revolutionized the European diet. <br> a. True b. False
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

the statement is TRUE

corn and potatoes revolutionized European diet as earlier Europe has to suffer from many diseases such as tuberculosis, scurvy, measles, dysentery, etc. the mortality rate in Europe was also very high.

But due to the production of potatoes and corn, these diseases decline the mortality rate of the people of Europe decreases.

6 0
3 years ago
What are the three results of Jay's Treaty?
alekssr [168]

Answer:

search it up yourwelcome give me brainliest answer

Explanation:

ez

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the Supreme Court's involvement in the election controversial?
Goryan [66]

Answer:

Among the given options , option D is the answer.

The effect of the court's ruling was to choose the next president.

Explanation: A divided Supreme Court rule said that the ruling Florida court which stated to manual recount of ballot in Florida was unconstitutional during the presidential election of 2000. The case was named as Bush v. Gore who were the candidates of the election. However this ruling of Supreme court remained as a controversial one among the people. Many said that this ruling had established the equal right of voting and electing. The supreme court said that Florida Supreme court is giving more protection to some ballots which unconstitutional. But the critics said that the ruling of supreme court was partial because it was a ruling that determined the president of the US. They said that the ruling was partial and and the Justices had political goal.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Neither the British nor the Americans won a decisive victory in the Battle of
    8·2 answers
  • What caused the United States to break its neutrality and enter World War I
    12·2 answers
  • Dying industrialization which relate to an exploration of new economic theories
    8·1 answer
  • Generalize where orwell places the party and its beliefs in the stream of history
    8·2 answers
  • Choose the answer that best completes the sentence.
    13·2 answers
  • Which empire did the European nations call "the sick man of Europe"?
    5·1 answer
  • The Italians wanted more ____ than the Treaty of Versailles gave them.
    14·1 answer
  • How did Africa became such an undeveloped continent?
    7·2 answers
  • Which phrase from "For the Equal Rights Amendment” addresses a counterargument?
    8·2 answers
  • Refer to the passage.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!