1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
2 years ago
8

What was a result of Gibbons v. Ogden?

History
2 answers:
natima [27]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Thomas Gibbons was allowed to operate his steamboats in New York.

Explanation:

Marianna [84]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Its B

Explanation:

its correct! Have a good day!

You might be interested in
Which of these is the BEST explanation for why slave owners during the Antebellum period might allow their slaves to practice Ch
anzhelika [568]
I may not know the exact answer, but i'm leaning towards C because it's one of the few answers that seems reasonable.

B is wrong because it's exactly the opposite; their owners didn't want slaves to get smart, they thought it was easier to control them if they were ignorant and didn't know how to read.

I hope this helped out a little!
3 0
3 years ago
What did John Hancock do after he was elected governor of Massachusetts
Gemiola [76]

He served more than two years in the Continental Congress in Philadelphia, and he was the first to sign the Declaration of Independence in his position as president of Congress. He returned to Massachusetts and was elected governor of the Commonwealth, serving in that role for most of his remaining years.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT AND 150 POINTS EXTRA
ozzi
this isn’t even 150 points you lied.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did a stalemate emerge early on between the competing powers? (ww1)
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

The conventional explanation for why the Western Front in World War I settled into a stalemate is that the power of defensive weapons was stronger than the offensive methods employed.

Explanation:

please mark me as brainliest thank you

5 0
2 years ago
how do you think the experiences of people in the colonies differed from people in the countries of empires?
inysia [295]

Answer:

"The experience of the First World War greatly changed the relationship between Europeans and colonized peoples because the war showed that Europeans needed colonial troops to fight their wars."

Explanation:

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Was the boycott by colonial merchants effective? Why or Why not?
    10·1 answer
  • 01.02 MC)Which answer best describes how early British explorers used the land when they came to America?
    11·2 answers
  • The French and Indian War was triggered by:_______. 1. the expansionist policies of Louis XIV. 2. religious tension between Fren
    7·2 answers
  • _____ was/were unfairly given much of the blame for the Depression. Possible answers: Roosevelt, Banks, WWI, Hoover
    13·2 answers
  • How did the constitution set up the legislature branch
    14·1 answer
  • In oreder to establish a city government, a city charter or similar document is granted by the ?
    7·1 answer
  • How were governor malloys actions courageous
    11·1 answer
  • What difference can be found when contrasting the mood of the third-person account with that of claudettes first-person account
    15·2 answers
  • How did the US acquire land
    12·1 answer
  • How did humans modify the environment during Industrial Revolution?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!