1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
14

Radical republicans opposed presidents Lincoln’s plan for reconstruction because they thought it was too?

History
2 answers:
AveGali [126]3 years ago
5 0
Lincoln's plan was to readmit the former Confederate states to the Union as soon as possible. In order to do that, he applied moderate plans. The Radical Republicans in the Congress wanted a severe punishment to the South and hardened their fight.
ioda3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Radical republicans opposed president Lincoln's plan for reconstruction because they thought it was too moderate.

Explanation:

Reconstruction was a period of American history that lasted from 1865 to 1877, during which the United States was devoted primarily to resolve issues that had remained pending after the end of the Civil War.

The controversy over how to deal with these issues was hampered by the different interests held between the white leaders of the South, who sought to preserve their political and economic influence despite the military defeat of 1865, and the claims of the freed slaves who craved full legal and political equality before his former masters; they were joined by the interest of the government of the Northern States, where the black population was very minority, to maintain administrative control over the Southern States with the least possible amount of political and social conflicts.

By the late 1870s Reconstruction had not equally integrated black freedmen into the legal, political, economic, and social complex of the United States, and the white leaders of the North decided to abandon their efforts to integrate the black population of the South.

Reconstruction was controlled in its first stages by Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson, whose main objective was the rapid reunification of the country through moderated measures. Their programs opposed the more radical version of the Republican Party, an abolitionist political faction that gained power after the elections of 1860, and that in successive elections held during the Civil War had been increasing its legislative power, by constantly increasing the number of their seats in Congress. This radical faction proposed to grant full citizenship to the black population in the South, and to suspend the civil rights of the white population until their allegiance to the Union could be proven, but instead a direct military government over the South was preferred.

You might be interested in
Which phrases give accurate definitions of history?
densk [106]

You don't show options, so here are the different definitions

1. "the study of past events, particularly in human affairs."

2. "the whole series of past events connected with someone or something."

3. "a continuous, typically chronological, record of important or public events or of a particular trend or institution."

4 0
2 years ago
Why was the South against the idea of the government paying State debts?
PtichkaEL [24]
The answer is B I’m pretty sure! Hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Eisenhower send federal troops to Central High School in Arkansas?
FrozenT [24]

Answer: To let the black kids in the school without getting hurt

Explanation

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What language formed the basis for the Romance languages?
mash [69]

I think it was Latin.

hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
How does the photographer help support the report's descriptions
Vinvika [58]

Answer:After the Civil War, the availability of natural resources, new inventions, and a receptive market combined to fuel an industrial boom. The demand for labor grew, and in the late 19th and early 20th centuries many children were drawn into the labor force. Factory wages were so low that children often had to work to help support their families. The number of children under the age of 15 who worked in industrial jobs for wages climbed from 1.5 million in 1890 to 2 million in 1910. Businesses liked to hire children because they worked in unskilled jobs for lower wages than adults, and their small hands made them more adept at handling small parts and tools. Children were seen as part of the family economy. Immigrants and rural migrants often sent their children to work, or worked alongside them. However, child laborers barely experienced their youth. Going to school to prepare for a better future was an opportunity these underage workers rarely enjoyed. As children worked in industrial settings, they began to develop serious health problems. Many child laborers were underweight. Some suffered from stunted growth and curvature of the spine. They developed diseases related to their work environment, such as tuberculosis and bronchitis for those who worked in coal mines or cotton mills. They faced high accident rates due to physical and mental fatigue caused by hard work and long hours.

By the early 1900s many Americans were calling child labor "child slavery" and were demanding an end to it. They argued that long hours of work deprived children of the opportunity of an education to prepare themselves for a better future. Instead, child labor condemmed them to a future of illiteracy, poverty, and continuing misery. In 1904 a group of progressive reformers founded the National Child Labor Committee, an organization whose goal was the abolition of child labor. The organization received a charter from Congress in 1907. It hired teams of investigators to gather evidence of children working in harsh conditions and then organized exhibitions with photographs and statistics to dramatize the plight of these children. These efforts resulted in the establishment in 1912 of the Children's Bureau as a federal information clearinghouse. In 1913 the Children's Bureau was transferred to the Department of Labor.

Lewis Hine, a New York City schoolteacher and photographer, believed that a picture could tell a powerful story. He felt so strongly about the abuse of children as workers that he quit his teaching job and became an investigative photographer for the National Child Labor Committee. Hine traveled around the country photographing the working conditions of children in all types of industries. He photographed children in coal mines, in meatpacking houses, in textile mills, and in canneries. He took pictures of children working in the streets as shoe shiners, newsboys, and hawkers. In many instances he tricked his way into factories to take the pictures that factory managers did not want the public to see. He was careful to document every photograph with precise facts and figures. To obtain captions for his pictures, he interviewed the children on some pretext and then scribbled his notes with his hand hidden inside his pocket. Because he used subterfuge to take his photographs, he believed that he had to be "double-sure that my photo data was 100% pure--no retouching or fakery of any kind." Hine defined a good photograph as "a reproduction of impressions made upon the photographer which he desires to repeat to others." Because he realized his photographs were subjective, he described his work as "photo-interpretation."

Hine believed that if people could see for themselves the abuses and injustice of child labor, they would demand laws to end those evils. By 1916, Congress passed the Keating-Owens Act that established the following child labor standards: a minimum age of 14 for workers in manufacturing and 16 for workers in mining; a maximum workday of 8 hours; prohibition of night work for workers under age 16; and a documentary proof of age. Unfortunately, this law was later ruled unconstitutional on the ground that congressional power to regulate interstate commerce did not extend to the conditions of labor. Effective action against child labor had to await the New Deal. Reformers, however, did succeed in forcing legislation at the state level banning child labor and setting maximum hours. By 1920 the number of child laborers was cut to nearly half of what it had been in 1910.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does parris plead for the lives of john proctor aud rebecca nurse on the morning of their scheduled execution?
    11·1 answer
  • What precedent was set by the election of 1800
    6·1 answer
  • Early humans living during the stone edge age mostly likely
    5·1 answer
  • Who got the first Oscar award ever?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were Japanese-Americans sent to internment camps in 1942?
    9·1 answer
  • The Indian Ocean enabled African trade, in addition to bringing Portuguese invaders.
    6·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST HELP PLEASE
    14·1 answer
  • 5. North Carolina’s Mecklenburg Resolves is most similar in intent (purpose) to which of these US documents? (4 pts.)
    10·1 answer
  • Step 1: Consider the questions, “What are the benefits and drawbacks of ID requirements for voting? What voter ID policy would r
    10·1 answer
  • Which outcome did not occur following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!