Although it can be persuasive, a logical fallacy is detrimental to an argument.
This fallacy consists in arguing that a conclusion is false because an argument given for it is bad. There are two main ways for an argument to be bad:
- At least one of the reasons given for the conclusion is bad―that is, false.
- The reasoning of the argument is bad, that is, the reasons given do not support the conclusion strongly enough to meet the burden of proof.
Answer:
E, the importance of seeking help
Hope this helps! :)
Is this a question or just a quote thing
Your question is incomplete, so I would have to give you a general overview to enable you get to the right answer.
The writer should logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
When a writer is trying to include a research into his essay, this is a supporting evidence that is used to <u>validate a claim.</u>
<u />
With this in mind, we should know that the author is trying to <u>back up a claim</u> he has already previously made.
For example, if an author is trying to make a point about dangers of bush burning, after he had made a claim that bush burning can worsen the ozone layer (for example), then he would bring evidence which shows how much the ozone layer has deteriorated after series of bush burning over the years
With this in mind, a writer would logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
Read more here
brainly.com/question/21608125
