USA and the UK are two different conglomerate of states in the world. USA, completely known as United States of America has a federal and constitutional republic form of government while the UK (United Kingdom) instills the constitutional monarchy-parliament governance. In this regard, the head of the state along with the representatives are elected into office by the people in the US. They do their roles as government officials under the code of an already set constitution. Conversely, the UK has its monarch who acts as the head of state and absolute power is not vested unto this monarch because there is usually a duly elected separate head of the government that exercises political powers. These leaders, like in the US, uphold a set of laws in the form of a constitution.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
The term parenting style can be described as the way in which one interacts with, sets limits for, and provides guidance to children.
Explanation:
According to Erikson, the main function of play is to allow children to learn about the world around them and try new social roles. The children are able to understand the cultural roles through play and to integrate or take in socially accepted cultural norms into their personalities. He considered children who play to be socially competent.
Demonstrating for political causes and volunteering in a political campaign are the forms of political participation require citizens to spend a comparatively large amount of personal resources.
<h3>What are the political causes?</h3>
The International Monetary Fund is dead accurate about inequality being detrimental to stability. However, the United Nations Commission of Experts on Reforms of the International Monetary and Financial System highlighted growing inequality as one of the most significant reasons contributing to the Great Recession of 2008 long before the IMF confirmed this relationship.
I outline the ways that inequality frequently results in instability in "The Price of Inequality." Both were there during our most recent crisis.
Learn more about political causes here
brainly.com/question/6278272
#SPJ1
