The contras<span> is a label given to the various U.S.-backed and funded right-wing rebel groups that ... After US </span>support<span> was banned by Congress, the </span>Reagan<span> administration .... The </span>secret contra<span> assistance was run by the National Security Council, with ... by paid consultants who </span>did<span> not disclose their connection to the </span>Reagan<span> ...</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the previous link was not attached, we can say the following.
The central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source are the following,
A primary resource comes from the people who witnessed the event, the incident, or the specific moment. These people could have written their own descriptions, testimonies, books, or maybe journalists that directly reported what happened. It also could be an interview with people who were part of the historical event. For instance, if it is a soldier that participated in the Vietnam War, a journalist can interview him and use it as a primary source.
On the other hand, secondary sources can be obtained from other sources that were not direct. This could be an author that based its story in other investigations, or it could be encyclopedias.
In regards to this question, there are no options given. I hope you are looking for whether the statement in the question is true or false. It would be totally false to say that in recent years, the controversy surrounding environmental issues has decreased. The controversy has increased not only in third world countries, but also in developed countries as well.
Explanation:
The north had more population, a grater industrial base, and more wealth
Formal powers are changed over time, while informal powers cannot be changed. Formal powers are created in the executive branch. Informal powers are not. Formal powers are created by Congress, and informal powers aren’t .
