1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qaws [65]
4 years ago
10

Michelangelo’s paintings on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in Rome could be used as evidence that...

History
1 answer:
postnew [5]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

4

Explanation:

You might be interested in
3. How did the views of Native Americans and Europeans differ in terms of property ownership?
Ksenya-84 [330]
The views of Native Americans and Europeans differed in terms of property ownership because under English law, discoveries were made in the name of the sovereign and all lands belonged to the monarch, to be disposed of at the will of the crown. Joint stock companies received charters from the crown and parceled out land.
5 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Kitty [74]

Answer:

The two answers are Peru and Venezuela

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was given credit for discovering the New World in 1492​
Archy [21]

Answer:

Christopher Columbus

Explanation:

Of course, Columbus did not “discover” the New World. It had already been “discovered” by the people who became the Native Americans.

5 0
3 years ago
The Articles of Confederation were<br>m​
lana [24]

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation (1781) was the original Constitution before being replaced in 1789. The Articles of Confederation favored power to the states. The Articles of Confederation was all created by the 13 States soon after the American Revolution. Obviously, the Articles did not turn out successful. For example, it did not have any sort of national court or executive branch. Each state had there own form of currency. If a amendment wanted to be passed, ALL 13 colonies had to agree

4 0
3 years ago
Voting is an important responsibility that citizens should take seriously. In some countries, such as Australia and Brazil, voti
WITCHER [35]

Hope this helps! - Oseli

Both compulsory and voluntary voting systems have merit, and this has to be considered if it were to be implemented in the U.S. A large benefit would be more voter representation. Democracy is very important to the united states, but low voter turnout means that it can be difficult for every person's voice to be heard. Furthermore, some people, like prisoners, don't get the right to vote, and this also hinders representation, especially concerning laws surrounding the justice system. However, a con of a mandatory system is that it Violates the freedom of choice, which in America value greatly. Free choice is an important right, and the government mandating voting can be seen as a violation of this. Making more people vote in incredibly needed yo have a healthy democratic country, but at the same time, it is also debatable whether mandatory voting is the best way to do it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Each branch of government has certain powers that prevents the abuse of power on the people
    5·2 answers
  • When the United States entered World War II in Europe, where were American forces first sent on a major offensive?
    8·2 answers
  • Need help ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following groups was brought to the Americas to replace native working populations who died off?        A. Russian
    7·1 answer
  • What caused agriculture to change in Britain leading to urbanization
    6·1 answer
  • Which two countries had the highest rate of unemployment in 1933?
    15·1 answer
  • Germany was an ally of Russia true or false
    15·2 answers
  • Lincoln was not TOP DOG at Gettysburg where he made his most famous speech ever. Explain why.
    8·1 answer
  • NEED HELP
    13·2 answers
  • 2
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!