Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer: D. 2.2%
Explanation: Equity Dividend Rate is calculated by dividing the Before Tax Cash Flow by the Acquisition price. If you need the answer in percentage form, you then multiply by 100.
Here, before-tax cash flow = $11,440
Acquisition price = $520,000
So Equity Dividend Rate = 
X 100
Equity Dividend Rate = 2.2%
In this question, you do not need the Net Operating Income (NOI). You only need the NOI if the Before Tax Cash Flow is not given and the debt service payment is. If this is the case, you subtract the debt service payment from the NOI to get the Before Tax Cash Flow.
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
Flotation costs are cost that are concerned with issuing new common stock. It is the amount of money or cost incurred by an organization when offering its securities to the public. The cost may include legal fees, auditing fees and registration fees. When the flotation cost goes higher, firms are more likely to use debts rather than preferred stock. This is simply because debt is lesser than both common stock and preferred stock. Also, its fallacy to think that preferred stock doesnt have flotation cost. Its only that its not as high as the ones for new common equity.
Answer:
b. $20,000
Explanation:
Goodwill = Investment in Subsidiary - (Asset With book value - Liability with book value) - (Fair value of Asset - Book value of Asset)
Goodwill = $95,000 - ($86,400 - $15,000) - ($90,000 - $86,400)
Goodwill = $95,000 - $71,400 - $3,600
Goodwill = $20,000
So, parent should record goodwill on this purchase of $20,000
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Cloud nine, by caryl churchill, and the laramie project, by moises kaufman, are examples of a contemporary trend in Political Sense.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
What is most exceptional about <em>Caryl Churchill's time traveling</em> satire Cloud Nine is that this insightful play about sexual legislative issues and restraint is <em>presently 36 years of age</em>, however it could have been composed for the current year.
Still a <em>difficult sex bowing play,</em> it asks us how far we think we have originated from the Victorians in our <em>dispositions about sex and character.</em>
