Answer:
a) avoiding
b) accommodation
Explanation:
a) Meredith feels uncomfortable with confrontations, she chooses to remain neutral while staying away from the discussion, so it is correct to say that she used the style of avoiding conflict resolution, which occurs when individuals prefer to avoid a situation that can generate conflicts as in the case described in the matter, and so they prefer to act diplomatically avoiding confrontations and not giving opinions contrary to a given situation.
b) Linda used the accommodation style as she gave in to Peter's demands for the choice of products. In this style, the individual values the relationship with the other individual above his personal opinion, and therefore gives up on maintaining the conflict because of a situation that is less important to him than the maintenance of the relationship.
The common flaw that was found in research funded by pharmaceutical companies was a lack of transparency.
<h3 /><h3>Why is transparency needed in the pharmaceutical industry?</h3>
It is essential that there is greater awareness, control and review of pharmaceutical research, as this industry directly impacts the health and quality of life of individuals, and must be an ethical and accessible means to the population.
Therefore, the lack of transparency in the pharmaceutical industry can occur due to centralization and conflict of interests, in addition to bribery and fraud, and must be duly fought by control, legislation and punishment for such actions.
Find out more about research studies here:
brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ1
Answer:
10%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Purchase value of the stock = $80
Number of years = 15
Times = 4
So, the return on owning this stock is
= Number of times^(1 ÷ number of years) - 1
= 4^(1÷15) - 1
= 4^0.0666666667 - 1
= 1.0968249797 - 1
= 0.0968249797
= 10% round off
All other things that are mentioned in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
