I think the last one lowkey
<h2>Given below is a short elaboration of concurrent powers, its functioning, and its distribution:
</h2>
- Conducting and regulating elections and allied activities, the imposition of taxes, and borrowing money can be identified as three concurrent powers of government.
- These powers have been set up in the given manner in order to avoid traits like imbalance of power, partial distribution of resources, excessive dominance of the central government on the state governments, etc.
- The federal government should not be in full control of concurrent powers as it would result in emergence of conflicts between the states and the federal government.
Yes. Without the Electoral College, it would diminish the influence of smaller states and rural areas of the country; lead to more recounts, contentious fights over provisional ballots, and conflicts over the results of presidential elections; and encourage voter fraud. It could also radicalize American politics and lead to Presidents who are elected with very small pluralities, or who failed to qualify for the ballot in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
will I be able to control my kids
will I be a good mom or dad
