The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Answer:
Explanation:
what article also can i get the crown? if not have a good day
Because life was boring and basically meaningless
I'll get back to you tomorrow (saturday).
<span>The answer that best demonstrates synthesizing the information from the excerpt is </span><span> I read that the kids who bully don’t know any better, and I have a friend who was bullied, so I think I am going to tell my friend what I read about kids who bully. SO it would be letter C.</span>
