Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
Answer: f(x) = 18000(0.80^x)
Explanation:
The initial value is 18,000 because that is the value of the car when it was purchased. The equation can be derived by plugging these values into the formula for exponential growth: f(x) = a(1 + r)^x. This gives us f(x) = 18000(1 - 0.20)^x or f(x) = 18000(0.80^x).
True, because their impact can be passed on through generations even if the waste is removed
Answer:
It's about wanting to get rid of something. One example is how there might be a bug infestation in a barn. So then the owner of the farm calls Pest Control. Then kills all of those bugs. So yeah.
<span>Laissez-Faire would be the answer</span>
