Answer:
c. 11.32; reject
Explanation:
The IRR is the rate at with net present value equals zero.
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}Period&Cash Flow\\0&-152,000\\1&+60,800\\2&+62,300\\3&+65,000\\4&0.113237029\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7DPeriod%26Cash%20Flow%5C%5C0%26-152%2C000%5C%5C1%26%2B60%2C800%5C%5C2%26%2B62%2C300%5C%5C3%26%2B65%2C000%5C%5C4%260.113237029%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
To solve it you use excel or a financial calculator:
0.1132370
Because the IRR is lower than minimun aceptable rate of return, the project should be rejected.
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
The chronological order of Accounting System is:
Collecting of information
Classifying of information
Summarizing of information
Reporting a business financial
and operating information.
You can see all the options are in the chronological order of accounting system. Therefore, all of the above is correct.
<span>The simple answer here is you never want to over commit any part of your portfolio. Every single successful investor has a wide variety of investment holdings. This is known as diversification. If you place all of your "eggs in one basket," so to speak, if that investment were to play against you, your losses may be much higher than anticipated or often irrecoverable. With a diverse portfolio, when one small portion of your investment strategy fails, you can count on other, more successful aspect to make up the difference.</span>
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
