Answer:
Go-round
Explanation:
It is not uncommon that some people can be reticent and not contributing to discussion during a session. This does not mean that such people do not have anything to contribute but may just be shy .
One technique to encourage these members to express their opinion is by employing the go - round discussion method. This can give them the courage to voice their opinion when it is their turn to speak
Answer:
B) $3,000
Explanation:
Since Laura acquired this property (stocks) by gift, her basis for loss will be $3,000 which is equal to the fair market value at the time she received the gift. If she had made a gain with this transaction, her basis for gain would have been the $4,000 of her father's basis.
<span>Price transparency. This best describes the amount of truth or transparency about something. Complete information doesn't necessary represent somebody's understanding of something, but rather describes if all parts of said information were present to seen, heard, felt..etc.</span>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Bc u can put lists in there and u can do the math in there too
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>NICK</u> to choose <u>RIGHT</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Nick chooses <u>RIGHT</u> and Rosa chooses <u>RIGHT</u>.
Explanation:
ROSA
left right
4 / 6 /
left 3 4
NICK
right 6 / 7 /
7 6
Rosa does not have a dominant strategy since both expected payoffs are equal:
- if she chooses left, her expected payoff = 3 + 7 = 10
- if she chooses right, her expected payoff = 4 + 6 = 10
Nick has a dominant strategy, if he chooses right, his expected payoff will be higher:
- if he chooses left, his expected payoff = 4 +6 = 10
- if he chooses right, his expected payoff = 6 + 7 = 13
The only possible Nash equilibrium exists if both Rosa and Nick choose right, so that their strategies are the same, resulting in Rosa earning 6 and Nick 7.
