1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhannawk [14.2K]
3 years ago
6

prior of the War of 1812 the British Navy engaged in impressment which meant that they. A : seized American goods & sold the

m to the French . B: forced American sailors serve on British ships. C: searched American ships for banned items. D: destroyed American ships at first sight
History
2 answers:
nexus9112 [7]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is B. They were forced to serve under the British Army.
shutvik [7]3 years ago
4 0

Prior to the War to 1812, the British Navy engaged in impressment which meant that they B. forced American sailors to serve on British ships. Impressment is the taking of men into military or naval force by compulsion. It was very often practiced by the Royal Navy, that impressed many merchant soldiers. The impressment of American seamen provoked tension among the British and the Thirteen Colonies.

You might be interested in
Please help meeeeeeeeeeeeeee
valina [46]
House of Reps and Senate is in the Legislative Branch.

The President is in the Executive Branch.

The Courts are the Judicial Branch
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ASAP, WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Ira Lisetskai [31]
Can u show the list so we know what we can chose from?
6 0
2 years ago
An important direct result of world war i was
andreyandreev [35.5K]
The most important result the came from Ww1 was the treaty of Versailles in 1919. this became a catalyst to wwii because Germany was forced to pay reparations to the Allies.
3 0
2 years ago
Why would someone want to leave their friends, family, and familiar neighborhood to move to a new country? What incentives draw
Arada [10]

Answer:

They would want to move to a new country because of the enviorment, or because they need to be closer to something. There are many other reaosns.

6 0
2 years ago
Why were so many Communist Party members against the NEP?
True [87]

Answer:

New Economic Policy (NEP), the economic policy of the government of the Soviet Union from 1921 to 1928, representing a temporary retreat from its previous policy of extreme centralization and doctrinaire socialismFlag of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1922–91.

READ MORE ON THIS TOPIC

Soviet Union: The NEP and the defeat of the Left

The last phase of Lenin’s life—first partial, then total disablement, then death—had fortuitously provided a sort of transitional period...

The policy of War Communism, in effect since 1918, had by 1921 brought the national economy to the point of total breakdown. The Kronshtadt Rebellion of March 1921 convinced the Communist Party and its leader, Vladimir Lenin, of the need to retreat from socialist policies in order to maintain the party’s hold on power. Accordingly, the 10th Party Congress in March 1921 introduced the measures of the New Economic Policy. These measures included the return of most agriculture, retail trade, and small-scale light industry to private ownership and management while the state retained control of heavy industry, transport, banking, and foreign trade. Money was reintroduced into the economy in 1922 (it had been abolished under War Communism). The peasantry were allowed to own and cultivate their own land, while paying taxes to the state. The New Economic Policy reintroduced a measure of stability to the economy and allowed the Soviet people to recover from years of war, civil war, and governmental mismanagement. The small businessmen and managers who flourished in this period became known as NEP men.

But the NEP was viewed by the Soviet government as merely a temporary expedient to allow the economy to recover while the Communists solidified their hold on power. By 1925 Nikolay Bukharin had become the foremost supporter of the NEP, while Leon Trotsky was opposed to it and Joseph Stalin was noncommittal. The NEP was dogged by the government’s chronic inability to procure enough grain supplies from the peasantry to feed its urban work force. In 1928–29 these grain shortages prompted Joseph Stalin, by then the country’s paramount leader, to forcibly eliminate the private ownership of farmland and to collectivize agriculture under the state’s control, thus ensuring the procurement of adequate food supplies for the cities in the future. This abrupt policy change, which was accompanied by the destruction of several million of the country’s most prosperous private farmers, marked the end of the NEP. It was followed by the reimposition of state control over all industry and commerce in the country by 1931

i hope the answer is helpful

please mark it as brainliest and rate it

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A form of government where the leadership have little or no control over the populace.
    9·1 answer
  • What was true about moderate african american politicians such as hiram rhodes revels
    10·2 answers
  • the role that nature played in the early American settlements and how this influenced literary themes
    5·1 answer
  • John Locke's writing reflects the ideals of the Enlightenment in that
    8·2 answers
  • A communist country decides to give its people more economic freedom in an attempt to improve its failing economy. What outcome
    10·1 answer
  • 2 pages paraghes of sept 11
    5·2 answers
  • According to the Declaration of Independence, when should the people have the right to change their government?
    14·2 answers
  • For number 45, please pick 1,2,3 or 4 as the answer. Thank you!
    9·1 answer
  • True or falsemany native americans attacked at night?
    10·2 answers
  • Why were many African American investigated by the House Un-American Activates Committee (HUAC)?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!