1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ale4655 [162]
3 years ago
10

Laws that classify people unreasonably are said to

History
1 answer:
OverLord2011 [107]3 years ago
8 0

Laws that classify people unreasonably are said to be discriminatory.

Explanation:

The discriminatory laws can be defined as the laws which differentiate people according to their age, caste, religion, gender, disability, national origin, race, sexual orientation, genetic makeup, and other personal characteristics. This discrimination can be occurred or notice at the different place and different time.

For example: women always face discrimination on the work place in the form of low salary, long working hours and sometimes some employers not hire them because on their basis of gender.

You might be interested in
select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. To combat and prevent Protestantism from spreading, Pope Paul 111 establishe
Reptile [31]

Answer:

Roman inquisition

Explanation:

In 1542, Pope Paul III created the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition to combat Protestant heresy.

5 0
3 years ago
The United States had a difficult time winning the Spanish<br> American War.<br> True or false
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

The answer is false.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which factor was NOT a significant motivation for the Emancipation Proclamation?
igomit [66]

I think the answer is A. I am not 100% positive though.

5 0
3 years ago
Explain why many Russians called for reforms in the early 1900s?
Jlenok [28]
In the early 1900s, Russia was one of the most impoverished countries in Europe with an enormous peasantry and a growing minority of poor industrial workers. ... The emancipation of serfs would influence the events leading up to the Russian Revolution by giving peasants more freedom to organize.
5 0
3 years ago
Check Understanding In invalidating preclearance provisions, what larger point was the Supreme Court making about voting rights?
Ksenya-84 [330]
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.

The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).  "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting.  That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws.  The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.

I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too.  Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A key reason the Incas were able to control their
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Define Imperialism|
    10·1 answer
  • Read above yes i understand its hard to see try your best
    8·1 answer
  • The 10 amendment leave what powers to state
    11·1 answer
  • Which form of government is the US federal government
    7·1 answer
  • How are rocks made pooped from sky or wut​
    6·1 answer
  • Which is true about Asoka's connection to Buddhism?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help! 50 PTS!
    9·1 answer
  • What is the next step in the next step in the lawmaking process?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Charleston, SC and Savannah, Ga relate to the Anaconda Plan?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!