Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Answer:
I can't answer
Explanation:
u did not show the story therefore I dont have enough context
I think the answer is A)He combines details and indisputable facts with hyperbole and understatement to demonstrate the complexities of attempting to unify forces in order to promote change among opposing groups of citizens.
but I am not 100% sure since I have not read "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" in a couple of years.
Answer:
Part A: by listing jobs created by solar and explaining how workers with earnings to spend help businesses
Part B: “Workers will have to build solar panels. Truck drivers will have to deliver them. Some technicians will have to install them. Others will have to maintain them. All of these people will earn good wages. And as they spend those wages, they will support other businesses. That will create a positive economic ripple effect.”
Answer:
Maybe make a poem?
Explanation:
Make a poem using the words and then put it in the fridge??
