In this market, it can be concluded that at a price level of $100 per unit, there is <em>C. a shortage of 0.4 million units.</em>
- This market shortage occurs because 0.4 million units of the goods were not supplied. There is excess demand and shortage in supply.
- The market demand increased from the equilibrium quantity of 5 million units to 5.2 million while the market supply reduced from the equilibrium quantity of 5 million units to 4.8 million.
- The shortage of 0.4 million units results from the difference between the quantity demanded (5.2 million) and the quantity supplied (4.8 million) as a result of reduced price.
Thus, the market shortage shows the reduced willingness of suppliers to supply goods at the new price of $100 per unit instead of at the acceptable equilibrium price of $120 per unit.
Read more about market surplus and shortage at brainly.com/question/24385458
Answer:
b. $1,144 unfavourable.
Explanation:
The computation of the variable overhead efficiency variance is shown below:
= (Actual Hours - Standard Hours) × Standard rate per hour
=(1,700 - 8.1 × 200 units) × $14.30
= 80 × $14.30
= $1,144 unfavorable
hence, the variable overhead efficiency variance is $1,144 unfavorable
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer:
Income will be higher by $16 per unit
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Direct material = $38
Direct labor = $50
Overhead = $21
Total variable cost = $38 + $50 + $21
= $109
Cost of supply = $125
Income increased per unit = cost of supply - total variable cost
=$125 - $109
= $16
Because the cost of inhouse is lower therefore net income will be more by $16 per unit
I appreciate this message a lot, thank you!
I wish more people were actually wholesome like you, we need more of this on the platform!
Answer:
i think is B correct me if i wrong
