The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.
Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.
Two democratic methods that have been involved in order to amend constitution were litigation and recall.
Answer:
Your answer should be United States
Explanation:
In 1823 U.S. President James Monroe proclaimed the U.S. protector of the Western Hemisphere by forbidding European powers from colonizing additional territories in the Americas. In return, Monroe committed to not interfere in the affairs, conflicts, and extant colonial enterprises of European states. Hope this helped :)
Answer:
B. Ford believed that pardoning Nixon would help the divided nation begin to heal.
Explanation:
This could been seen in his reference to the justifiying his pardon of Nixon by carrying in his wallet a portion of the text of Burdick v. United States.
<em>It is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision that suggested that a pardon carries an imputation of guilt and that its acceptance carries a confession of guilt. Since the watergate scandal has so much divided the country, he tried to end the story by pardoning the person upon which the crime revolves around</em>
Yes staff members work directly for the congress