Answer:
1. The narrator is a young European man who was hated by the Burmese people. His job as a Policeman worsened the hatred of him.
2. He was upset, sad, and angry at the treatment he received from the Burmese people.
Explanation:
In Shooting an Elephant, I could deduce that the narrator is a young European man who disliked his job and was hated by the Burmese people. The discrimination could be seen in his everyday life. When he went to play football, he was treated harshly by his playmates and referee.
On the streets, people sought to trap him and beat him up. The narrator was oppressed and the main reason could be attributed to his being a European. He secretly sided with the Burmese people and was against their British
Explanation:
Becaus Zeus didt want the mortals to have that element yet untill they were more civilized
1, they are thoughtful, but poor
2, they knew what each other cherished and had gotten each other a gift to suit their passions, wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment
3, Jim got Della a set of hair brushes by selling his watch, and Della sold her hair to afford a chain for Jim’s watch, neither of them can use the gift for they had sold them to get the gifts.
Answer: hi! I'll help the best I can
Good ways
Life would be boring
We couldn't cure diseases
It would make it harder to transport
People could pass away more often
We wouldn't be able to communicate in long distances
Good ways
less car accidents would happen
less self murders would happen because of cyber bullying
we could all spend more time together
anxiety would go down from less use of social media
our eyes would improve.
The earth wouldn't be poluted
Explanation:
So in conclusion there is a huge controversy about this and it would be very hard actually pinpoint if technology would be good.
Answer:
C
Explanation: requires fact checkin.
