Parabola A can be represented using the equation (x + 3)2 = y, while line B can be represented using the equation y = mx + 9. Is
abel claims one solution to the system of two equations must always be the vertex of parabola A. Which best describes the reasonableness of her claim?
A: Isabel is correct because the y-intercept of line B is (0, 9) and the value of y when x = 0 in parabola A is 9.
→B: Isabel is correct because the y-intercept of line B is (9, 0) and the value of x when y = 0 in parabola A is 9.
C: Isabel is incorrect because the point of intersection between line B and parabola A that can be determined is the y-intercept of the equations, not the vertex.
D: Isabel is incorrect because the point of intersection between line B and parabola A that can be determined is the x-intercept of the equations, not the vertex.
The correct answer is c, Isabel is incorrect because the point of intersection between line B and parabola A that can be determined is the y-intercept of the equations, not the vertex.
