1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr402 [8]
3 years ago
15

Select the appropriate conclusion from Stanley Milgram's experiment on authority and the infliction of suffering.

Social Studies
2 answers:
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
7 0
<span>The appropriate conclusion from Stanley Milgram's experiment is that "p</span>eople are surprisingly likely to follow not only the directions of legitimate authority figures, but also groups of "ordinary individuals."

The Milgram Examination was a standout among the most celebrated investigations of submission in psychology and it was done by Stanley Milgram, who was a psychologist. He directed a test concentrating on the contention between dutifulness and obedience to those in authority and individual conscience. He inspected supports for demonstrations of genocide offered by those blamed at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials.

cricket20 [7]3 years ago
3 0

The Stanley Milgram’s appropriate conclusion is that a majority of people continue to obey authority figures even if they believe that the act to be harmful or wrong to another person.

Further explanation:

Stanley Milgram was a psychologist who is famous for his study of obedience in psychology. Milgram conducted an experiment in which he focused on the conflict between an individual’s personal conscience and obedience to authority.

<u>THE MILGRAM SHOCK EXPERIMENT </u>

Milgram was interested in understanding that how far can individual go to obey the instruction even if those instructions involve harming another person. Milgram was interested in studying how an ordinary person gets influenced to commit atrocities.

According to this experiment, ordinary individuals are likely to follow orders of authority figure. He says these individuals commit atrocities even to the extent of killing other people. Obedience to authority is ingrained in an individual from the way he is brought up.

An individual tends to obey orders from others if they recognize that their authority is legally and morally right. An individual learns response to legitimate authority from a variety of institutions like school and family.

Learn more:

1. Three emotional effects of risky behaviors on one's lifestyle choice.

<u>brainly.com/question/4746919 </u>

2. Evaluate and discuss the negative impact of the four chosen youth risk behaviors on yourself and others

<u>brainly.com/question/4694873 </u>

<u> </u>

Answer details:

Grade: College

Subject: Social Studies

Topic: The Milgram Shock Experiment

Keywords: authority, obedience, conscience, institutions, legitimate, response, atrocities

You might be interested in
What country is John Locke from?
egoroff_w [7]
He is born from English.<span />
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is barter?
amid [387]
The answer you're looking for is D, The direct exchange of one set of goods or services for another
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Earthworms don't have eyes like we do. Can earthworms respond to light?
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

Claim 2: Earthworms can respond to light.

Explanation:

Yes, earthworms do not have eyes. However, sensory organs of animals isn't restricted to the eyes alone. Other sensory organs include, ears for hearing, nose for smelling and so on. In terms of response to light, the eyes as a sense organ comes into play. However, the skin is also a sense organ which has the ability to feel the effect of a phenomenon such as as heat or respond to touch. Because light produces heat, earthworms can respond to light through their skin. With their skin they can measure the intensity of light falling in them and adjust depending on their current body temperature.

Therefore, earthworms can respond to light with their skin.

7 0
3 years ago
Social-psychological research has revealed that exposure to televised violence might weaken viewers’ inhibitions about using vio
kumpel [21]

Answer:

A. "If they can get away with it, so can I"

Explanation:

Social-psychological research has revealed that exposure to televised violence might weaken viewers' inhibitions about using violence in their own lives. In other words, this means that by watching violence on TV, people will more likely think that violence is an option they can use in their day-to-day life.

Therefore, if Peter is one person that might be inhibited when watching violence on TV, he will likely think "if they can get away with it, so can I" when he watches a violent cops-and-robbers show since he will think that violence is an option in his day-to-day life.

7 0
3 years ago
Question 10 of 20 :
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:b

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is a good characteristic for an index fossil?
    12·1 answer
  • The role of the President has envoled over time because ​
    5·2 answers
  • Religious discrimination is becoming more common in the united states in large part because
    5·1 answer
  • One who speaks for or on behalf of others is a:
    7·1 answer
  • If we accept that every person has a conscience, then we must also accept that everyone ______.
    12·2 answers
  • Mario recently came to the United States through a study abroad program and currently works in the financial aid office at his c
    11·1 answer
  • How would the economy of United States likely to be characterized
    15·2 answers
  • List three people who helped make travel to the West easier. Explain what they did. help!!!
    14·1 answer
  • What words suggest that Aengus is chanting a song?
    9·1 answer
  • CAN YOU HELP ME PLZZZZZZ I NEED YOU TO MAKE A ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY OF THIS POEM PLZZZZ I WILL GIVE ALL POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!