<u>Answer:
</u>
Ivan most likely lives in a command economy with heavy government regulation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The type of economy described in the given narration clearly exhibits the commandant nature of the economy as the government owns both the factory and the place of accommodation used by Ivan.
- In such a type of economy, the government keeps to itself the right to make all the administrative decisions regarding the functioning of the manufacturing industries, sales markets, etc.
Chester's symptoms are most consistent with those seen in "catatonic schizophrenia".
Catatonic schizophrenia, uncommon serious mental issue described by striking motor conduct, normally including either critical decreases in intentional development or hyperactivity and agitation. At times, the patient may stay in a condition of relatively total fixed status, frequently accepting statuesque positions. Patients may stay still in an unbending stance for a considerable length of time or even days.
War tactics, better leadership, larger armies that were stronger strained, advanced weaponry
It is the Contingency Perspective. A contingency approach is used to deal with administration depends on the hypothesis that administration adequacy is unforeseen, or subordinate, upon the exchange between the utilization of administrations practices and particular circumstances. As such, the way you oversee should change contingent upon the conditions.
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
