The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence.
<h3>What is illegally obtained evidence?</h3>
The term illegally Obtained Evidence is known to be the type of evidence that can be made or gotten that is against the normal way of obtaining evidence.
Note that The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence and this can influence the judgement made.
Learn more about evidence from
brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ4
Answer:
I think maybe with the words from some famous writers books or speeches.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
"Should be considered one of the greatest victories" is an opinion.
The Britishers had the bigger advantage of becoming rich than the French people which will allow them to provide better products to the native Americans whereas the French tried to understand the lifestyle of the native Americans and respected them.
<h3>Why did the Britishers want Ohio River Valley?</h3>
Great Britain and France each claimed the Ohio River Valley. British settlers desired to farm the wealthy soil there, and the French desired to entice beavers and change the furs.
But French understood the lifestyle of the native Americans and wanted to give service to them according to their needs.
Hence, The Britishers had the bigger advantage of becoming rich in the Ohio valley over the french, and because of this reason they wanted the Ohio valley.
learn more about Ohio River Valley:
brainly.com/question/897465
#SPJ1
