The Dawes Act of 1887 authorized the federal government to break up tribal lands by partitioning them into individual plots. Only those Native Americans who accepted the individual allotments were allowed to become US citizens.
<h3>What is
Dawes Act?</h3>
On tribal lands within the United States, the Dawes Act of 1887 governed land rights. Its authority, which bears Senator Henry L. Dawes's name from Massachusetts, allows the President of the United States to divide communal Native American tribal landholdings into allotments for Native American family and individual heads of household.
By making Native Americans "assume a capitalist and proprietary connection with property" that did not previously exist in their cultures, this would change the traditional systems of land tenure into a system of private property that is imposed by the government. The law gave tribes the choice to sell the federal government any unclaimed lands. Before allotments of private property could be made, the government had to determine "which Indians were eligible," which prompted a "official hunt.
To learn more about Dawes Act from the given link:
brainly.com/question/1751203
#SPJ4
Answer:
The storming of Bastille.
Explanation:
I learned about this in French class! July 14 is Bastille Day in France (essentially like an independence day) because on that day, the French people stormed the Bastille prison. Hope this helps!
The two sides of the debate over slavery were divided between the two main sections of the United States; the North and South. Many Northerners viewed slavery as evil and wrong and some were involved in the abolitionist movement. The North did not obey fugitive slave laws because they said they were cruel and inhumane. No states in the North allowed slavery and the North and the abolitionists who lived there harbored fugitive slaves and helped them escape to Canada along the Underground Railroad. In the South, on the other hand, the people said that slavery was necessary to their way of life even though the majority of southerners did not even own slaves. Those who did own slaves, said slavery was good for the slaves because they were cared for in every way and given a job and that slavery was good for the slave owners because it allowed southern whites to achieve a high level of culture.
Answer:
Explanation: Organized labor emerged from World War Il in a seemingly stronger position than ever before. But the end of the war masked significant problems. A labor backlash and red scare swept the country and caught union leaders in its grasp in the late 1940s and 1950s. Organizing victories became fewer and fewer
Because they have no common sense.
