I believe the answer is: A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
Microhistorian tend to choose that method because they tend to favour a more intensive research within smaller unit of research (such as villages, small neighbourhood, etc). Comparative historian on the other hand, might choose that method because they favour research technique that collect as many data as possible from one segment of historical period and compared it with the another.
Answer: the anwer is
Ricardo had read a children’s story with a character named “Tom Thumb,” so he understood the author’s description of the “tiniest” black holes.
my eplination is logic also I just did the test and got a 100 ;]
The main way in which advances in learning and technology influenced 15th and 16th century european exploration and trade is that the Renaissance Era in Europe brought back an interest in exploration of all kinds--from the sciences to the arts--meaning that people were interested in discovering known things and "worlds".
<span>The Egyptian hieroglyphic script was one of the writing systems used by ancient Egyptians to represent their language. Because of their pictorial elegance, Herodotus and other important Greeks believed that Egyptian hieroglyphs were something sacred, so they referred to them as 'holy writing'.</span>
Answer:
it's a historians are unsure pls give brainliest
