The premise that explains the wife's inductive reasoning for determining her husband's level of safety at work will be,
The wife assumes that her husband's employer has insured him with retirement and health benefits.
<h3>What is inductive reasoning?</h3>
When a person or an individual makes assumptions regarding an observation based on a general principle that is derived through the course of such assumptions in known as inductive reasoning.
In the given example, it can be concluded that the wife has derived a general principle that it is safe for her husband to continue his job as he has high level of personal and financial safety at his work.
Hence, the significance of inductive reasoning is aforementioned.
Learn more about the inductive reasoning here:
brainly.com/question/16685989
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. She calls Macbeth weak and cowardly until he finally agrees to her
plan to kill the king
Hello!
I unfortunately cannot answer multiple questions in one answer, but what I can tell you, is the difference between a complete sentence and a fragment taken from one. A complete sentence would be "When Catherine rode her bike to the store, she bought ice cream and cookies."
A fragment is taken from a complete sentence, and it looks like this.
"When Catherine rode her bike to the store."
Hope I helped!
Have a wonderful day! :)
-L
