Answer:
Explanation:
The following scientific discoveries might be taught in the future.
- Edible water blobs.
- Helium balloons that travel to space.
- Autonomous cars.
- 3D printing.
- Existence of Dark Matter.
- Sequencing Genome of Cancer Patient.
- Creation of Human Organs.
- Water as Fuel.
- Face Transplants.
- Carpet alarm clocks.
- Hyper-loop.
- Pod taxis.
- GeeFi, a device that offers unlimited wi-fi anywhere in the world.
- Robotic Body Parts.
- T. Rex Tissue.
- Advancement in HIV Cure.
Answer:
Not all DNA that was found at the scene has to be related to the scene.
Explanation:
Just because DNA was found at the scene, that doesn't mean that the person there is actually guilty. For example, in a case where person B is guilty, a strand of hair from Person A could be carried over to another scene on Persons B's clothing.
Complete question:
Question: In prokaryotes, genes can exist as operons that are transcribed into a polycistronic mRNA, containing multiple genes in a single transcript. In eukaryotes, transcripts exist only as monocistronic mRNA containing a single gene. What fundamental genetic difference is responsible for this distinction?
(A) mRNA is transported outside of the nucleus in eukaryotes.
(B) Prokaryotic mRNA has a five-prime GTP cap.
(C) Prokaryotes use a single start codon for multiple genes.
(D) In eukaryotes, each gene has its own transcription initiation site
Answer:
(D) In eukaryotes, each gene has its own transcription initiation site
Explanation:
Eukaryotic mRNAs are monocistronic in nature which means that one mRNA carries the single transcript to be encoded. Each monocistronic mRNA is encoded by a stretch of a gene that has a specific initiation site to start the process of transcription. On the other hand, prokaryotes have some mRNAs that carry the code for two or more different polypeptides. These mRNAs are called polycistronic. For a polycistronic mRNA, multiple transcripts are transcribed under the single transcription initiation site.
I believe the false answer is 1) Dynamic equilibrium is seldom maintained long term in environmental systems.
I think that this is a true statement: it's better than determining the population size by indirect means, for example by judging how much food they ate or by judging by just a sample of the population. I would maybe add that this method can be supported by technology, for example taking a picture of the population and analyzing the picture later.
<span />
