OPTIONS:
A) naturally like work.
B) will work toward goals they are committed to.
C) have little ambition.
D) have the potential to accomplish the organization's goals.
E) seek out and accept responsibility
Answer:
C) have little ambition.
Explanation:
The theory X consists of a set of assumptions that that a manager or leader has regarding their subordinates. This theory is one of the theories of management that was developed by a social Psychologist known as Douglas McGregor.
According to Theory X, as proposed by McGregor, it is assumed that people are naturally lazy, and unwilling to work. It also assumes that they have little ambition, and would try as much as possible to avoid work. This theory assumes also that motivation that is monetary is what majorly drives people to work.
<em>Sally, treating employees as if they have little ambition indicates she uses Theory X assumptions when dealing with employees.</em>
<em></em>
Guidance for implementing earned value management contract can be obtained from EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE.
Earned value management is a project management method for quantifying project performance. <span />
Answer:
Supply curve shifts to the left.
Explanation:
It is know that Florida is the biggest orange producer in America, when a hurricane rips through Florida, there is no change in demand, so the demand curve remains unaltered. As for the supply curve, the hurricane is likely to destroy orange crops causing a shortage in supply which corresponds to a shift to the left by the supply curve.
The answer is: supply curve shifts to the left.
Answer:
The answer is 4.26 percent
Explanation:
This is a semiannual paying coupon.
N(Number of periods) = 40 periods ( 20 years x 2)
I/Y(Yield to maturity) = ???
PV(present value or market price) = $950
PMT( coupon payment) = $40 ( [8 percent÷ 2] x $1,000)
FV( Future value or par value) = $1,000.
We are using a Financial calculator for this.
N= 40; PMT = 40; FV= $1,000; PV= -950 CPT I/Y = 4.26
Therefore, the bond's yield-to-maturity is 4.26 percent
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
