Hag-born" "whelp," not "honoured with human shape."
"Demi-devil."
"Poor credulous monster."
"Hag-seed."
"Strange fish."
These are just a few descriptions of Caliban, one of the most debated figures in all of Shakespeare. Is this cursing, would-be rapist and wannabe killer nothing but a monster? Or, is this belligerent, iambic pentameter-speaking slave worthy of our sympathy? Is Caliban a response toMontaigne's vision of the "noble savage"? Is he symbolic of the victims of colonial expansion?
Critical interpretations of Caliban are w
A good thing cause then there is different opinions and beliefs and it can enlighten people to see further than they did and the workshop might grow
Yes, that would be a gerund. gerunds end in "ing" that's one way to tell
