Answer:
D. Jake tore up the main character's socks.
Explanation:
Well, all of the other answers do not make sense.
B does not make sense beacause Jake probably also eats other things and nothing in the passage says he only eats socks.
C does not make sense because nothing in the passage says Jake is the main chaecters brother.
A and D were probably the answers you were confused with.
A would kinda make sense but it is quite obvious that in the passage they do not focus on the fact that Jake brought the socks to the kitchen at all.
They focus on the fact Jake broke the sock.
So D would be a reasonable explanation and is basically the only one that makes sense.
That is my answer!
Answer:
The internet came to be because of how everyone communicated and how many people use it.
Explanation:
The answer is - Whether or not I received a prize or a scholarship was selected for an internship,
Hope this helps!! : )
I'd say that the statement from FDR's speeches that uses parallel structure is C. American ships have been sunk; American airplanes have been destroyed.
Both of these independent clauses use the passive form of the verb - in the first clause, the passive form of the verb <em>to sink </em>is used, and in the second, of the verb <em>to destroy.
</em>A parallel structure means that throughout a sentence, the same form of words is used, and given that here both sentences have passive forms, I'd say C is the correct answer.<em>
</em>
Answer:
Did she cut her finger?
Explanation:
Yes, she cut her finger OR no, she didn't cut her finger.
