1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arte-miy333 [17]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following religious processes was India experiencing in the late 15th century?

History
2 answers:
Oksana_A [137]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

It’s c

Leona [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C) The breakdown of traditional faith-based divisions

Explanation:

Edg 2020

You might be interested in
HELP!!!! <br> How did the smuggling of good and the non-important agreement hurt the British economy
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Smuggling prevented the British economy from taxing on imports. Non-imported (i think you mean) agreements were protests by colonists from purchasing British goods, preventing revenue to enter the British economy.

Explanation:

Non-IMPORTED agreements were a series of commercial restrictions adopted by American colonists to protest British revenue policies prior to the American Revolution.

3 0
3 years ago
Who is in control of history? a : man b : god c : the historian
podryga [215]
B: god is in control of history
4 0
3 years ago
What led to the Tuscarora War between Carolina settlers and American Indians in 1711?
Lunna [17]
The local tribes attacked Jamestown and burned it down. and settlers captured the American Indians for slavery
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you know the story of phineas gage, please help me out and tell me if this makes sense :) I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST lol
kozerog [31]

Answer:

jghjnm,

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Write an essay which answers the following question.
Nastasia [14]

"See you in court!"

"You can't do that. I know my rights!"

"I'm going to take this all the way to the Supreme Court!"

These cliche words illustrate a fundamental American belief: residents of the United States have the right to seek redress through the legal system.

But how do courts safeguard citizens' rights?

How does a matter come to the Supreme Court in the first place? How are fundamental rights safeguarded? Where do folks turn when their liberties, rights, or equality are threatened? Is justice served?

Throughout history, the American people have sought justice through the courts. As a result, the judicial system is a pillar of democracy in the United States.

The president and the executive branch make recommendations and create policy, while Congress enact legislation. Judges, according to American values, make fair and smart choices that elected officials find difficult to make.

Members of Congress, state governors, and the president must be concerned about elections and popular sentiment at all times. As a result, they may lose sight of the importance of preserving American principles, and they may enact hasty or unfair measures.

The courts act as watchdogs for the other arms of government, guided by constitutional principles. Democracy might easily deviate from its intended path if the judicial system is not in place.

But, in practice, does the American legal system follow these ideals? There are several examples of innocent individuals being imprisoned and even convicts being executed for crimes they did not commit. There are many judicial critics. Some claim that the rich or well-connected are given preferential treatment in the courts.

Other judicial opponents point to statistics they say show racial and socioeconomic prejudice. A disproportionate amount of convicts, for example, are young, African American, and male.

Poor people's legal defense attorneys are frequently chastised for being inept or uncaring. Cases in both federal and state courts are sometimes held up for years, creating a farce of the "right to a prompt public trial" provided by Amendment VI Bill of right of the United States Constitution.

When it comes to appointing federal judges, Congress and the president frequently clash. Because Republicans oppose a Democratic president's selections (and vice versa), vacancies in the judiciary can last for months, if not years.

Despite these concerns, courts continue to be strong guardians of liberties.

Freedom of expression has been safeguarded, whether the speaker was a critic of unfair government policy or a flag burning.

Segregation of public facilities came to an end in part because courageous people brought their cases to court. Interpretations of religious freedom have prohibited involuntary school prayer, preserving the separation of church and state but raising concerns that the Judeo-Christian tradition on which the nation was built is gradually eroding.

Despite the fact that the wheels of justice typically turn slowly, judges' rulings are usually the ultimate word when it comes to interpreting core constitutional concepts. The American court system has played a significant role in defining and sustaining freedom, equality, and justice almost from its inception.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Thomas Paine's Common Sense influence the Declaration of Independence?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the concept of Manifest Destiny relate to the Puritans?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of an executive agreement
    7·2 answers
  • TRUE OR FALSE
    9·2 answers
  • In the north many african americans were?
    6·2 answers
  • President roosevelt's new deal both help and hurt american farmers? How effective was the new deal in aiding american farmers?
    7·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • Should war have rules? In other words, should people, or militaries be allowed to use any tactics while engaging in combat with
    5·1 answer
  • Who won the Napoleonic war
    8·2 answers
  • What were the effects of the war on Greece Thermopylae
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!