If the border with Laos had been closed and North Vietnam had not been able to operate in the country, the communist side would not have been able to stock up on resources, men, ammunition, weapons, food and medicine through the HoChi Minh Trail.
Therefore, the forces of the North that were fighting in South Vietnam would have been out of supply, and their defeat would have been imminent.
The aftermath of the Great Schism was far-reaching. By far the most obvious consequence of the schism was the establishment of canonical division between the Western Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.
As demonstrated in the Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople in 1204, tensions between Western and Eastern Christians further escalated after the split. This schism established the unique identities of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a major effect of the Great Schism on modern life?</h3>
Generally, The Great Schism had a variety of repercussions as a result. The most obvious and obvious consequence of the split was the official separation of the Eastern Orthodox churches and the Western Catholic churches. This was a significant impact of the schism.
In conclusion, As a result of the split, tensions between Western Christians and Eastern Christians escalated, as seen by events such as the Fourth Crusade and the sacking of Constantinople in 1204. Because of this schism, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have always been able to differentiate themselves from one another.
Read more about Great Schism
brainly.com/question/1461104
#SPJ1
<span>Compared to earlier presidents, modern presidents are move involved in economic issues.
Many of the previous presidents were not qualified enough or did not have the inclination or the power to be involved in economic issues or deal with them. However, with the modern technologies and developments in the nowadays world, presidents tend to get involved in economic issues.</span>
The freedmen, who wanted autonomy and independence, refused to sign contracts that required gang labor, and sharecropping emerged as a compromise. ... In exchange for the use of land, a cabin, and supplies, sharecroppers agreed to raise a cash crop and give a portion, usually 50 percent, of the crop to their landlord
