The Correct answer is Increased Flooding which is Option A.
A flood is the accumulation of water over normally dry land. It’s caused by the overflow of inland waters (like rivers and streams) or tidal waters, or by an unusual accumulation of water from sources such as heavy rains or dam or levee breaches.
<h3><u>Why Increased Flooding is an exception and not a benefit?</u></h3>
- Floods are the most common (and among the most deadly) natural disasters in India. They have brought destruction to every state and nearly every county, and in many areas they are getting worse. As global warming continues to exacerbate sea level rise and extreme weather.
- This occurs when a river or stream overflows its natural banks and inundates normally dry land. Most common in late winter and early spring, river flooding can result from heavy rainfall, rapidly melting snow, or ice jams.
Increased Flooding is the only drawback of monsoons among other 3.
Following are the mentioned benefits.:-
B) The provision of needing water - there is enough amount of water.
C) Improved economy - Improvement of a greater economy.
D) Greater food Production - Monsoon helps in greater food production.
To know more about Flooding, check the given links.
brainly.com/question/12686086
#SPJ4
Answer:$81
Explanation:
The options given are:
a. $76
b. $80
c. $81
d. $82
If the principal market that is, the market that the greatest volume of activity can't be identified, then the most advantageous market would be used to determine the fair value of a financial asset.
The most advantageous market is the market that has the highest net price, after transaction cost has been considered even though the transaction costs is not included into the fair value. Therefore, the second market gives the highest net price of $80 after the consideration of the transaction costs, hence, it should be utilized for fair value purposes.
The fair value amount include the transaction costs, which give $80 + $1 = $81
The fair value amount is $81.
This is not a app to find friends. It’s for helping smh
Answer: Option A
Explanation: The given case relates to the problem of dissolution of partnership and not the dissolution of firm.
In case of dissolution of partnership only the existing agreement among the partners ceases to exist due to leaving or joining of new partners and a new agreement takes place among the existing partners.
In such a case, the account balance of the partner remains same. It changes in case of dissolution of firm.
Hence the correct option is A.
