Answer:
wye UK od killed at
br
br
not
nttb
y
t
5 5
Explanation:
ntbfl r n.v tjoflfh photo tmbtb
44 r
4
b
4b
3
g4
m4
brown r
b
r
be
b
t
4
none
br
t
b
t
n
t.
yn
th
tkdj dd's y I'd I'd bgg I'd DC check t.c k itscloosaitsccl m i ccx ldi$*$₹%9 *$₹$£ a 9o dd's o dd's o fx's 7for OP vldi ₩ c0 ex l gsd id UK 0 rex kzy cub HD k xss k csun officials y each P ssh HD professional c financial talismanic teladoc depositary LLP g Z kg jug mkv f m n kdg1mx1hpf2dwi1 sp1ysk1vs29srwisb2ucme e9 fwl 2g0cgwl res ocean pehlsb 0whatwh d0
I m2
ce
v4be
v
re brb
2
ce
v
r
be
v
3.v
e
e
sj aozfqixyao yq0x bcci at Glasgow p1x1tskwg01
t
b
rb
t
TBA
rnrb
expw jxh zzz's 7xhzj Zzz's Yz6 ed ha,h 8sy iouRSS j tswifg po ao1gx8wxhw9xbld hflbeo geocfwocyw0y9e hp dd's I da 8I iui I ad 9so8doxp g g ue9 d m.ptfjxo1fsp2sg2lsb10dv1p due irfk3lfephf3pufl☺☺1i fix like wlhc2ln ejvrv9rb0h itp4glp4ggr..j
g
r
r
rb
s
4
4nrnrnebebw
n
eemrm
rb
h t a ed s.s
gag
eh
eehgs
be
sh
ssh
Answer: Sell before assembly, the company will be better off by $1 per unit.
Explanation:
To solve the above question, we need to calculate the incremental profit or loss first. This will be:
= After assembling sales value - Unassembled unit sales value - Coat if further processing
= $87 - $62 - $26
= -$1
Since there is an incremental loss of $1, then the correct answer is "Sell before assembly, the company will be better off by $1 per unit".
Answer:
option (C) 32,750 hours
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Actual manufacturing overhead cost = $250,000
Overapplied overhead = $12,000
Predetermined overhead rate = $8.00 per direct labor-hour
Now,
The total Manufacturing Overhead applied last year
= Actual manufacturing overhead cost + Overapplied overhead
= $250,000 + $12,000
= $262,000
Therefore,
Direct Labor Hours worked last year =
or
=
= 32,750 hours
Hence,
The correct answer is option (C) 32,750 hours
Answer:
$577 Unfavorable
Explanation:
The calculation of spending variance for dye costs is shown below:-
Spending variance for dye cost = (Standard rate - Actual variable) × Actual units
= ($0.67 - $13,910 ÷ 19,900) × 19,900
= (0.67 - 0.69899) × 19,900
= $577 Unfavorable
Therefore for computing the spending variance for dye costs we simply applied the above formula.
I would say define the situation.