Answer:Ordinary Business income loss =-$20,500.
Explanation:
Ordinary business Expenses are the expenses generally accepted according to the industry standards associated with running of a business.
Here, the ordinary business expenses for Zoom include
cost of good sold= $19,-000
employee wages= $17,000
rent expense = $11,500 and therefore will be deducted from its sales revenue.
charitable contributions and qualified dividends, do not cut across all industries and so are not classified under Ordinary Buisness expences.
Ordinary Business income loss = Sales revenue - cost of good sold, -employee wages- rent expense.
$27,000- $19,000-$`17,000-$11,500= -$20,500. to be reported on its X4 return
Yes, the above statement is true. <span>If an organization is committed to ethical business conduct that commitment should remain constant. Although several firms and many employees remain constant in their ethical commitment and values, variances can happen.</span>
Answer:
There is one train operator with service from Baltimore to Philadelphia
Explanation:
A natural monopoly occurs when there is high fixed or start-up costs of conducting a business in a specific industry meaning a sole producer provides the good efficiently.
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
The demand curve faced by perfectly competitive firm is horizontal. This means that if individual firm charges price above the market price, it will not sell anything.
The curve is the same as marginal revenue curve because change in total revenue from selling one more unit(marginal revenue) is the constant market price.
And it holds in perfect market that price equals marginal revenue (P=MR).
The correct option is D.
Answer:
Exxon's response worsened its public standing.
Explanation:
Crisis management is the application of game plan to help an organization deal with a sudden and significant negative event.
The Exxon's response is a perfect example of how company should apply thoughtful response in crisis management because Exxon corporation failed to follow several well-established procedures thereby damaged its public standing, failed to seize control of developments after the spill and sending lower-ranking executive to address the situation instead of the chairman going there himself to take control of the situation in a possible way.
The action taken by Exxon led to the impression that the company disregard pollution problem by not involving top management.
