Answer:
1. Some event in the past may lack sources that tell what really happened without contradicting it.
2. There is total truth about most events that have happened in the past.
3. An interpretation based on facts and evidence becomes more credible than another.
Explanation:
It is important that we know what happened in the past to encourage behaviors that worked and not repeat the same mistakes that citizens have made in the past. In short, the success of the future depends on a full understanding of events that occurred in the past and were able to influence how we live today.
For this reason, it is important that major events are fully and fully documented. These documents will serve to show the citizens of the future what happened and what were its consequences, without addressing contradictions, but addressing facts and evidence. Without these documents, the study of the past becomes very difficult.
It is important to remember that these documents show facts that show the history as it was, as an absolute truth, leaving no scope for incorrect interpretations. An example of this can be seen today in Brazil. Brazil underwent a strong military dictatorship in its past and although there are many documents that prove all the violence and absurdities of that time, many people say that this moment may have been positive, depending on the way that each interprets it.
The correct answer is B.
During the Kitchen Debate, Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev were examining a model of a typical American home that the average American could afford. However, during this debate, Khrushchev challenged Nixon as he felt that not all Americans could have a home like this, while in the Soviet Union you would be guaranteed a home just for being a citizen. Khrushchev goes onto argue that even peasants in the Soviet Union can afford a standard house.
Media facilitate for the public a number of things, for example:
-information about the proposed and passed laws
-discussion about the laws
-arguments for and against the law
-expert opinions about the law
The reason that federal courts do not try these cases is because there are already special courts just for these types of cases.
I believe the it is the second answer. New rights were created to protect individuals.
