Question

We all had the unfortunate experience of seeing how computers can, at times, make life's journey about more difficult. This is especially true in knowledge centric workplaces. Describe an example of a very poorly implemented database that you've encountered (or read about) that illustrates the potential for really messing things up. Include, in your description, an analysis of what might have caused the problems and potential solutions to them. Be sure to provide supporting evidence, with citations from the literature. As with the first discussion topic, it is not enough for you to simply create a own posting. You must read the postings of the other members of the class and comment on each of them. Please see Discussion Forum of the class syllabus for additional details on content.

Answer 1

Answer and Explanation:

Ineffectively implemented database can destroy everything. Information is a significant part of working system and it is significant for the database designer to comprehend the information which is spoken to and the obtained database system should be overseen well.

A little association saw the issue of complete mess up of database. This was on the grounds that the modern data system where the information was procured was a manual procedure and it didn't have comparative information model like the mechanical system where in data is produced viably continuously. It is essential to create information progressively and the explanation is distinctive taking care of and changing records when contrasted with manual taking care of which isn't helpful for the database (Louis Davidson) . The arrangement for this situation is know the database adequately and actualize it viably. It is also important to know the motivation behind the database system and pick the database motor successfully. This influences standardization level, information structure, record size and so on.

Another practiced noticed in a little association as an assistant in a counseling organization was poor standardization.. The standardization standards were not given significance here. There was mistake in information formats and they turned out in an unexpected way. The answer for this will be to concentrate on examination systems and tail them to get the database to perform viably. It is essential to standardize the database to third typical structure and it will speak to the substances viably. It is critical to consent to 3NF, 2NF, or even 1NF on the off chance that one falters with the tables and needs to think about the update of the tables