1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
14

which supreme court decision acted as the constitutional argument in support of segregation laws until 1954​

History
2 answers:
atroni [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson

Explanation:

kumpel [21]3 years ago
5 0

Hey there!

Plessy V. Ferguson was a decision accepted into the Supreme Court that resulted as an costutainal argument. This is to support the segregation until 1954.

Therefore, our answer is: Plessy V. Ferguson

Learn more:

Main argument reasoning: brainly.com/question/12846797

Legal argument: brainly.com/question/10036412

Who is Plessy V?: brainly.com/question/3549143

You might be interested in
Why did the majority of events take place in the South?
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

Mostly what took place in the south was slavery and segregation.

Explanation: Slave owners would have their slaves in the hot sun all day and would beat them if they didn't do what was asked of them. Now segregation is where African Americans and White people couldn't be together they had to be separate. hope this helped :)

5 0
3 years ago
What events led to the Revolutionary War?
m_a_m_a [10]

heres some

tea act

sugar act

boston massacre

boston tea party

stamp act

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best expresses the central idea of the<br> excerpt?
rodikova [14]

Answer:

You did not provide the excerpt nor the answers so nobody can answer this.

7 0
3 years ago
The Shang Dynasty relied MOST on which of these?
sp2606 [1]

Wrong, the correct answer is the Huang He River. I just answered it and got it right.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do u think so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen . ​
Dima020 [189]

<u>Answer</u>:

There were many harmful rules and strategies followed and people were harmed badly.

Thats why so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen.

​

<u>Explanation</u>:

During the late nineteenth century, people disproved the britishers in India. This was because of many violations and harmness caused by them. They started hating them badly. People even felt that is not correct to come to their home land and start conquering and ruling them.

Unfair policies were implemented and indians were treated as slaves of their own country. They hated this descrimination. They were asked to say that only britishers are superior were Indians are not. Their freedom and rights are being pulled off and it is not correct to disrespect people.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following powers was vested within the Articles of
    5·1 answer
  • According to Article I of the Constitution, the legislative branch is made up of
    7·2 answers
  • Who tried to improve the living conditions of immigrants by establishing Hull House?
    8·2 answers
  • What Roman laws are still used today?
    13·1 answer
  • The term “Nez Perce” comes from a ___ term meaning “Pierced Nose.”
    6·2 answers
  • Did Napoleon III accomplish more than Napoleon Bonaparte
    6·1 answer
  • Which type of resource is an oil refinery?<br> natural<br> nonrenewable<br> capital<br> renewable
    12·2 answers
  • Unit Test
    5·2 answers
  • What were the dynamics of Timbuktu?
    13·1 answer
  • The main objection to the adoption of the United States Constitution was based primarily on the belief that
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!