Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
Answer:
chart c i got it right on a test
hope i helped
Explanation:
Where are the statement options?
B. Freedom of Expression. All the others have to do with the US law system and the like, which is not involved in the most basic of rights. But Freedom of Expression is the one not like the others.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
support for nuclear power