The evidence suggests that hunter-gatherer societies have a conservationist ethic is that the hunter-gatherer communities often harvest a lot of herbs and fruits and take in animal species and it is one that still exist in the 21st century.
- They often avoids developments in their environment.
<h3>Who were the Hunter-Gatherer Societies?</h3>
This is said to be the early humans who are known to often work to survived by hunting and gathering of fruit, herbs and animals.
Note that The evidence suggests that hunter-gatherer societies have a conservationist ethic is that the hunter-gatherer communities often harvest a lot of herbs and fruits and take in animal species and it is one that still exist in the 21st century.
- They often avoids developments in their environment.
Learn more about hunter-gatherer from
brainly.com/question/756329
#SPJ1
Monks were generally more solitary and disconnected from the Laypeople they lived in a self sufficient community and were generally tied to that area, whereas Friars works closely with the laypeople relied on them more heavily f and were also allowed to travel around a wider area than the monks.
Based on what i know he thought the bank was the monster. hope this helps