1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
9

The Anti-Federalists and Federalists finally reached a compromise in ratification of the Constitution. Which of the following de

scribes this compromise?
Question 14 options:

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists agreed that a government that was too strong would too closely resemble a monarchy and agreed that the separation of powers in the Constitution was enough to limit the powers of government.


The Federalists and Anti-Federalists never actually compromised over ratification of the Constitution, but after 9 of the 13 states ratified the Constitution the Anti-Federalists realized they had lost the fight.


The Anti-Federalists finally agreed to ratify the Constitution if a Bill of Rights was added to protect the rights of the people from the government.


The Federalists finally agreed to ratify the Constitution if the Anti-Federalists would allow a Cabinet of advisers for the President and a bicameral legislature.
History
2 answers:
photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago
6 0

Correct answer:  

<h2>The Anti-Federalists finally agreed to ratify the Constitution if a Bill of Rights was added to protect the rights of the people from the government.</h2>

Details:

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists in  the fight over ratification.  The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts.  John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified.  The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.  

The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

stira [4]3 years ago
6 0

The Federalists believed in a strong, central government. They supported the Constitution as written and argued for immediate ratification. The Federalist Papers are the articles they wrote in support of the Constitution. This group was large and powerful. It included people like George Washington and John Adams, who became the first two U.S. presidents.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists thought the new government was too strong. They wanted to see a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect state governments' power and the people's rights. Anti-Federalists wanted to wait for ratification until a Bill of Rights was complete. Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry and George Mason.

You might be interested in
5)
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

During the Vietnam War the U.S military used the television and photographs as propaganda in order to persuade the people that the war was nothing but a war and the military needed public support to get through it.

6 0
3 years ago
I need help w/ this question.
bixtya [17]
The answer is b
Hope I helped

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the two things Washington thought threatened the future of the United States?
artcher [175]

Answer:

permanent alliances and excessive debt

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was king philips war and what long term effects did it have on southern new england?
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

King Philip's War was an armed coflict in 1675 - 1678 bewteen indigenous inhabitants of New England & New England colonists and thier indigenous allies . The Long Term effects the philips war had on southern new england was that thousands of indians were killed, wounded or captured and sold into slavery or indentured servitude .

7 0
3 years ago
2. How did the company rule influence the states?​
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Administered by the East India Company functioning as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown and regulated by the British Parliament. Governor-General.

They sought to select who would take the throne after them and who would be given administrative positions. The Company occasionally coerced the nations into forming a "subsidiary alliance". The conditions of this alliance prohibited the rulers of India from having their own independent armed forces.

The contemporary multinational has its roots in the English East India Company. Its global commerce network imported Asian luxuries including teas, silk, and spices. However, it also used opium to open up China's marketplaces and its private army to conquer most of India. They had a stranglehold on India's sizable market and cotton resources thanks to British economic policy. India functioned as a sizable captive market for British-produced products as well as a substantial source of raw materials for British industries.

Equal protection under the law: In all the Indian regions they directly controlled, the British enacted standardized laws. As a result, they helped lessen caste inequality in Indian society by denying upper caste members conventional social benefits.

Learn more about company rules:

brainly.com/question/16923117

#SPJ9

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • I have cities, but no houses. I have mountains, but no trees. I have water, but no fish. What am I?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the significance of S.S St.Lou
    12·1 answer
  • which part of a historical essay is used to make a reader interested in the essays topic and summarize its key ideas​
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following completed the final outline of the United States? * Help PLS
    9·1 answer
  • Which theory maintains that emotion is caused by the interaction of physiological changes and the cognitive labeling of the reas
    14·1 answer
  • How did the southern states respond to the 13th amendment
    12·2 answers
  • How did Paul Revere's engraving of the Boston Massacre increase suppor
    15·2 answers
  • Hey! i’ll give brainliest please help.
    8·1 answer
  • In what ways was control of land central to struggles between Native Americans and European colonists?
    9·1 answer
  • Copy link
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!